Just fucking hold, dammit!

Finally, it’s time to finish for the NixieHOLD.

When we left last time, the only large bit missing where the metal brake shoes and extrernal sleeves. The latter, because I’m a fancy fuck, where to be machined out of titanium, because it would be easy to anodize later.

I have to confess I wasn’t particularly sure I could pull that off on the first try, with just a 100mm long stock of titanium that would have enough material for just the required pieces, but I braved myself and went at it.

Titanium is notoriously picky to work, especially without carbide. As smoothly as the first piece (lathe work) went, as bad the second was. I managed to harden a small section of titanium and destroyed 3 consecutive cobalt drills trying to plough through it. In the end, I could ram through the hardened part with an endmill, and it went well after that, but damn!, as I already told you, there where no second chances with the stock I had.

Second op in the mill was much more smooth, especially because the carbide inserts in the boring head:

Ye, that fixturing cost exactly 10 cents. XD

Unfortunately, on the lathe op I had made a slight mistake and forgot a spring pass, making one of the internal diameters 0,1mm larger than I wanted. It doesn’t seem like much, but it had a noticeable wobble in the test internal piece.

As luck would have it, also one of the counterweight bodies was 0.05mm larger in diameter, so I was able to just match the sleeves to the bodies and have a perfect fit. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Also, while on the blueprints I had matched the final diameter of the sleeves to the original counterweights, I decided I preferred to have them slightly larger (+2mm in diameter) to enhance grip.

Second to last operation was to trim the sleeves to final lenght and mill the recess that would accept the titanium spring ring that would hold them in place. First, a mandrel was made and turned barely undersize, so with little expansion, it would retain the sleeves.

A bit crude, I know.

The operation was smooth as silk:

Test!

Last op was drilling and threading the screw in the left sleeve that would interface with the teflon ramp:

At first I was only going to use a grubscrew, but then I realized that without anything to actually torque it against, it would require loctite to stay in place. Here also came in handy that I had left the diameter of the sleeves 2mm larger, so I changed the plans on the fly and milled a small recess and turned down a M3 stainless screw head to it’s barely minimum to fit in there. I would still use a drop of loctite, but now I could use the softest one instead.

To machine the brake shoes I turned a holder groove in some bronze stock and let the CNC do it’s thing;

Cutting them down from the metal stock was an adventure in itself, but basically I clamped them on the vide with an internal separator, and milled away the whole bottom stock. Bit wasteful, but I can live with it.

So, it is at this moment, when finding out one of the assumptions you made is not quite exactly true…that your heart sinks.
You see, I had measured and calculated the grip zone in the throttle sleeve to be some lenght, but as it happens, that piece has some play, and instead of measuring the worst case scenario, I measured the best!
What does that mean? Well, where I had placed the o-ring that acted as brake, instead of being always like this:

Was mostly sitting like this:

I don’t even know how did it work on all the 3D printed trials, with the o-ring barely touching the nylon sleeve. Anyhow, I had to redesign the brake shoes, but after some tests, I saw that the o-ring was not particularly good at retaining either. If I used a softer rubber with more grip, it was also too soft and the throttle would just roll it around. If the rubber was harder enough to resist the forces, it just didn’t have enough grip to hold.
After much frustration, I decided to try less gentle means of braking, first, sandpaper:

That worked, but even after switching to 100 grit, it still had this point where it would just sand (duh!) the surface and no longer grip. After much thinking, I concluded that I needed to actually grab the surface, but sandpaper was always going to have too much contact area, so I decided to use M2 grubscrews.

Used cup type until I received better single point ones.

You might have notticed that there are only grubscrews on one of the pieces, but not the other. This is because one of the brake shoes is working against the throttle spring, but the other would be working in favor of it. Thus, should the o-ring that keeps them closed, fail, one of the shoes would actually want to lock up harder, as the throttle spring pushed against it. The other shoe, instead, is forced away from the nylon sleeve, and only kept holding it by the combined grip from the grubscrews and the smooth shoe that reduces the slack between surfaces to zero.

It was at this time that I also changed the angle of the teflon ramp to a steeper one, to enhance the spring return of the left sleeve to zero (and also by chance, reduce the twist angle required to operate, making it more comfortable to use):

With that extra feature, all the pieces where ready to install:

I had start to polish one of the sleeves in this photo, but not the other, XD

A closeup of the mechanisms, just missing the bowden and steel cable:

But, does it work?

HELL YE IT DOES!

In the video I was using the old teflon ramp, hence the large twist angle in the left hand. Also, just general awkwardness of a new device you are not used to. Since then I have made it more natural to use.

Beauty shots:

Conclusions:

  • Was all this effort worth it?
    ABSOLUTELY. Now I can let go of the throttle to rest my right hand, or, especially, to check my right leg bag. I can’t get back to NOT having it installed now.
  • Is it safe?
    Unlike ALL throttle locks, this is redundantly safe, as it does not lock, but HOLD. For starters, if you are not operating it, it won’t do a thing. If the steel cable breaks, it does nothing. If the return spring breaks, the spring-oring can close the brake pads by itself. If the o-ring breaks, the geometry of the gubscrew-brake makes it NOT want to lock the throttle (would actually try to prevent you from accelerating). The throttle holding can be overcome in any of the situations.
    If, compared to ALL other throttle locks, those are not good enough arguments for you, hey, just go fuck yourself elsewhere.
  • Is it commercially viable?
    NOPE. Altough the device is not especially complicated, and could be simplified here and there to make it somewhat cheaper, I don’t have the resources to do that. It would have to be made one by one, and noone has that kind of money to spend on this, nor I the interest to do it anyways (unless someone has really deep pockets and wants to change my mind).
  • Is it legal to use?
    DEPENDS. This is safer by design than ALL other throttle locks in the market, but if those are illegal in your country or state, this will still be. With that said, it is absolutely invisible to any visual inspection, no matter how thorough, as changing handlebar counterweights is perfectly legal everywhere and there are infinite models. These ones just happen to be inconspicuously loaded.

PART IPARTII

Hold the…

…throttle, II.

What did you expect, a door? Do I look like Hodor to you??

Continuing with the adventure, I proceeded to mechanize the smöl piece that pulls the cable. The best spare metal I had around to do it was a small block of bronze, so I just went with it.

Drilling 1mm holes, even in easier material like this, is always unnerving:

Yeah, the M2 screw looks like it will hold properly.

In place:


Yeah, this photo was taken before the one on top of it, before rounding the peg.

Another issue I found was that the original inclined plane I had made seemed a bit too steep for the mechanism. At the time I was afraid that a shallower angle would result in the spring not being able to pull against the resistance of the rotary mechanism. After pondering a bit, I decided to make a less steep path, and also optimize the piece a bit, since this mechanism is only pull, and won’t require push of the slider:

And here, working absolutely beautifully:

The only momentary setback is that I only have at hand 0.6mm steel rope, but the PTFE sleeve is 1mm ID. That can introduce a huge amount of backlash that’s difficult to compensate, as you can see in the following video. Once I block the plunger of the brakes, the sleeve starts moving on it’s own to absorb the extra slack:

I did find a short piece of 0.8mm rope, and indeed works much better.

Continue reading

Hold my…

…throttle.

(I don’t drink beer, sorry-not-sorry.)

Overthinking time! Today: Throttle locks.

Have you ever done a ride so long, your right hand is left useless? For those gaudy fucks who have cruise control (real cruise control) I salute you with my erect middle finger. For the rest of us mortals who have a bike with no lavish fly-by-wire throttles, there are other solutions.

You have fancy ones:

Less flashy ones:

And things you should not even use to clamp a sub’s dick to a wall:

But, and it’s a big BUT, I have realized they are all wrong, because, you see, they put the control in the same hand that you want to block. What you really want is to lock/unlock with the left hand, leaving the right alone to do it’s speedy-speedy/stoppy-stoppy thing. And no, using your left hand to hold the throttle is definitely stupid beyond even the shittiest throttle holds. /transfers over the connection and SLAPS YOU for thinking that/

BUT, how, you might be asking, can one accomplish that? (you are probably asking why, instead, but I don’t give a fuck.)

Well, my CB500x has a continuous tube handlebar, wich means I can run a bowden tube through all it’s lenght and connect something on the left side, to something else on the right. Easy.

A bit of drawing later:

So, at first I tried to just cable actuate a similar screw-clutch type than the more streamlined locks, but that proven complicated by requiring both a 90º vector turn in the cable with no micro-pulleys avaliable, and too much lenght of travel cable-wise.

A printed test model:

I must admit It did work to an extent, but that was not the bestest way by any means. I knew it was a failure well before even finishing the current print.
Meanwhile I was waiting, I happened to discover that the throttle handle body, at least in my particular model, happens to go beyond the end of the metal tube that holds it. I could definitely use a drum style brake in there!

Once I had tested, and failed, with the first dumb idea, I dived on the second one.

Since I needed measurements from the various internal diameters, I decided to bite the bullet and dissasemble the counterweights in my own bike. You can’t imagine my face when I saw that this was inside the handlebar:

I had always assumed the thing was just the outher portion you could see, attached with some kind of inclined plane nut (like the first model at the top of this post), but nooo, it had to be massive and hidden away and act as a surprise when I decided to overengineer a stupid thing in it’s place.

Oh well… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ …in any case, that is just an elongated nut to add mass, back to the studio:

Damn, this thing looks like a German WWII grenade.

So, this is the drum brake thing implemented on the right, throttle brake side:

The central plunger separates both halves that contact the white nylon drum in the throttle grip, braking it.

But, you might ask, does it actually work?

Well shit, yes it does, shut the fuck up already.
Here’s a video of the brake shoes moving (white piece is teflon for maximum slipperness):

The rubber band is just to hold them. They can’t fall once installed. I did implement a groove to leave the rubber permanently in there, but that would also reduce the braking surface, and as said, once installed, they won’t go anywhere. (Think of it like some bearing retainers in those flexible clutch/brake levers that can fall down when you work on them, but won’t once finally installed).

On the controller side, I really want to look both unconspicuous AND simmetric to the other side, so I made the effort of operating the cable pull using the existing sleeve coupled to a rotary inclined plane:

That inclined plane piece links to the outside grip cover with a passing headless screw.

Should you where been paying attention, you might be asking by now: “What is that weird groove in the bottom of the cross-sectioned piece?”

This one, you unattentive bitch.

Well, as I told before, this is a bowden driven mechanism, that means that somewhere in the piece there is a cable and a sleeve that run along the thing. But this also has an angled nut to retain itself in the handlebar tube. Unfortunately, those types of nuts have the bad habit of twisting around until they are fully locked, and that would put the bowden in immediate risk of shear.

To prevent that, an antirotation pin was added, and it’s seat in the nut elongated, so it can move up and down when tightened/loosened. Said pin also doubles as axle for the brake pads to pivot.

Here’s a frontal view of the bowden/pin interaction:

When the screw is loose, the amount of play built in the front piece means that the nut top groove for the bowden tube can’t go above the shear line. As you tighten it, the nut can only go down (in the graphic) and also can’t rotate, keeping the bowden safe at all times. The pin would act as downward limit for the nut, but you should not be using this in a tube whose diameter is so much different than the nominal diameter of the piece.
Pretty nifty if you ask me.

Since I was at it, I decided to go all fancy out and make the parts to be the same for both the left and right sides for TWO reasons:

  1. Why not?
  2. I can.
  3. Surprise, motherfucker!
    Actually at manufacturing is easier if I have to make more of only one model, albeit slightly complex overall, instead of different models. That can streamline the machining process a lot.

As for holding the outher grip pieces in place, I made simple ring clips and recesses on both sides of the piece:

It’s a shame I can’t use steel wire that looks like enamelled copper, the color contrast would be wonderful. With a copper ring the sleeve stays in piece really well, but still can’t risk it in road conditions.

Unfortunately, the cable puller piece has to be machined out of metal even for this test.

The pressure required to hold the cable with that little vertical M2 screw and withstand the pin sliding in the inclined plane would be too great for the PLA to hold. That will have to wait for the next chapter of the adventure.

For now I’ll leave you with a size comparison between the metal counterweight and the 3D printed model.

No, I didn’t print the longer nut because that would be a waste of PLA and it doesn’t add anything to the mechanical requirements for a test.


PART IIPARTIII